2003 KTM 640 Adventure R
Summary:
A highly capable off-road machine that can be ridden anywhere
Faults:
Soft OEM seat replaced with a Renazco Racing seat at 2000 miles.
Rocker cover leak at 7000 miles.
Soft fork and shock springs replaced with stiffer units at 9000 miles.
General Comments:
There is nothing presently available from another manufacturer that has the capability of a 640 Adventure.
Unless a substantially "better" version comes along, I'll continue to ride it and be happy.
Not a bike for everyone... a dedication to the model and mechanical aptitude are prerequisites. Your efforts will be rewarded with a street legal bike, capable of serious long-range off-road use... at speeds other "Adventure bikes" can only imagine.
Would you buy another motorcycle from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 18th December, 2005
2nd Apr 2006, 20:07
A KLR 650 is cheaper than the KTM, but the two bikes are not comparable. The KTM has quite the upper hand in the off-road performance department, as well as street acceleration.
5th Apr 2006, 22:50
No real comparison. The KTM has it in spades over the heavy, piggish KLR. And it is lighter and has a larger fuel tank. Plus, the KTM is a much better looking machine. The only advantage, in my opinion, is the cost. But KTMs have a great resale value, and are much better off road.
To each his or her own.. there are fans of both machines, but I will choose KTM every time.
12th Dec 2007, 20:15
This bike is fun, I've had it for three years now. Gets on it for sure. A wheelie machine.
30th Nov 2008, 02:44
These bike are so much fun. Yes they're a little rough and not very refined. 640's don't idle well, have problems between 1st and 2nd, tend to over-heat in traffic etc. But they have torque, snarl, performance and attitude! They go really well cruising the highway (if you've put a road sprocket on the back), and they go x@$@% well off-road. Nothing comes close. NOTHING!!
6th Feb 2006, 21:47
You say there is nothing on the market that compares.. what about the KLR650?? Cheaper too..